Hi,

On 4/19/23 09:58, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
Hi Michal,

Am 17.04.2023 um 12:16 schrieb Michal Simek:

On 4/3/23 15:34, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsme...@weidmueller.com>

Mask the expected and show the unexpected warning "No permission to
change config object" for NODE_OCM_BANK_0 because this node is used to
detect if further zynqmp_pmufw_node function calls should be skipped.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
<stefan.herbrechtsme...@weidmueller.com>
---

  drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
b/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
index dc8e3ad2b9..8435b58ef9 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ int zynqmp_pmufw_load_config_object(const void
*cfg_obj, size_t size)
         err = xilinx_pm_request(PM_SET_CONFIGURATION,
(u32)(u64)cfg_obj, 0, 0,
                                 0, ret_payload);
         if (err == XST_PM_NO_ACCESS) {
-               if (((u32 *)cfg_obj)[NODE_ID_LOCATION] ==
NODE_OCM_BANK_0) {
+               if (((u32 *)cfg_obj)[NODE_ID_LOCATION] !=
NODE_OCM_BANK_0) {
                         printf("PMUFW:  No permission to change
config object\n");
                         return err;
                 }

First of all we should very likely create a macro for NODE_OCM_BANK_0
to cover that dependency that it is used in 3 different locations
which have to match.

Okay, I will add a PMUFW_CFG_OBJ_SUPPORT_NODE macro.

The second is the change you have in 2/2 should be the part of this
patch because when only 1/2 is applied you change behavior.

The patches should be independent, and the behavior change is intended.
The message should be printed if you don’t heave the permission for a
specific config object and not if the driver checks for support of
config objects. The NODE_OCM_BANK_0 call should never fail if load of
config objects is supported.

And changes in 2/2 makes sense.

I would be even fine to move skip_config out of zynqmp_pmufw_node()

The zynqmp_pmufw_node() function doesn't return an error and the
skip_config variable is static inside the function.

and setting up skip_config value directly in zynqmp_power_probe() not
to check in every call.

We still need to check the skip_config variable inside zynqmp_pmufw_node
to skip the load of the config object if the pmufw doesn't support it.


 85         if (ret == XST_PM_NO_ACCESS && id == NODE_OCM_BANK_0)
 86                 skip_config = true;

Without testing on HW I though to change it like this that skip_config is configured and checked only once at probe time.

What do you think?

M

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c 
b/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
index ece00e7958a4..aebb6f6d6d95 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/firmware-zynqmp.c
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ static unsigned int xpm_configobject_close[] = {
        0U,     /* Loading permission to Overlay config object */
 };

+static bool skip_config;
+
 int zynqmp_pmufw_config_close(void)
 {
        zynqmp_pmufw_load_config_object(xpm_configobject_close,
@@ -71,22 +73,14 @@ int zynqmp_pmufw_config_close(void)

 int zynqmp_pmufw_node(u32 id)
 {
-       static bool skip_config;
-       int ret;
-
        if (skip_config)
                return 0;

        /* Record power domain id */
        xpm_configobject[NODE_ID_LOCATION] = id;

-       ret = zynqmp_pmufw_load_config_object(xpm_configobject,
-                                             sizeof(xpm_configobject));
-
-       if (ret == XST_PM_NO_ACCESS && id == PMUFW_CFG_OBJ_SUPPORT_NODE)
-               skip_config = true;
-
-       return 0;
+       return zynqmp_pmufw_load_config_object(xpm_configobject,
+                                              sizeof(xpm_configobject));
 }

 static int do_pm_probe(void)
@@ -251,13 +245,8 @@ int zynqmp_pmufw_load_config_object(const void *cfg_obj, size_t size)

        err = xilinx_pm_request(PM_SET_CONFIGURATION, (u32)(u64)cfg_obj, 0, 0,
                                0, ret_payload);
-       if (err == XST_PM_NO_ACCESS) {
-               if (((u32 *)cfg_obj)[NODE_ID_LOCATION] == 
PMUFW_CFG_OBJ_SUPPORT_NODE) {
-                       printf("PMUFW:  No permission to change config 
object\n");
-                       return err;
-               }
+       if (err == XST_PM_NO_ACCESS)
                return -EACCES;
-       }

        if (err == XST_PM_ALREADY_CONFIGURED) {
                debug("PMUFW Node is already configured\n");
@@ -299,8 +288,14 @@ static int zynqmp_power_probe(struct udevice *dev)
               ret >> ZYNQMP_PM_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT,
               ret & ZYNQMP_PM_VERSION_MINOR_MASK);

-       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP))
-               zynqmp_pmufw_node(PMUFW_CFG_OBJ_SUPPORT_NODE);
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP)) {
+               ret = zynqmp_pmufw_node(PMUFW_CFG_OBJ_SUPPORT_NODE);
+               if (ret == -EACCES)
+                       skip_config = true;
+
+               if (!ret)
+                       printf("PMUFW:  Permission to change config object\n");
+       }

        return 0;
 };



Reply via email to