On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:02:03 -0600 Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:37:44 -0600 > > Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > >> * fix where we define this, it should !CONFIG_NAND_SPL, read the old > >> config.mk incorrectly. > > > > I don't think that will make a difference -- CONFIG_NAND_SPL is never > > set when symbols are extracted into autoconf.mk, and > > CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT is not used when building the SPL. > > it seems to work out ok. My point is it will work either way, the ifdef just confuses things, since that's not actually the mechanism by which a different linker script is used for SPL (nor would it work if you relied on the ifdef for that). -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
