Hi Simon,
On 25/04/23 01:12, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Neha,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 06:32, Neha Malcom Francis <n-fran...@ti.com> wrote:
Support added for HS and GP boot binaries for AM65x.
tiboot3.bin, sysfw.itb, tispl.bin and u-boot.img: For HS devices
tiboot3.bin_unsigned, sysfw.itb, tispl.bin_unsigned,
u-boot.img_unsigned: For GP devices
Note that the bootflow followed by AM65x requires:
tiboot3.bin:
* R5 SPL
* R5 SPL dtbs
sysfw.itb:
* sysfw
* board-cfg
* pm-cfg
* sec-cfg
* rm-cfg
tispl.bin:
* ATF
* OPTEE
* A53 SPL
* A53 SPL dtbs
u-boot.img:
* A53 U-Boot
* A53 U-Boot dtbs
Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-fran...@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/dts/k3-am654-base-board-u-boot.dtsi | 1 +
.../dts/k3-am654-r5-base-board-u-boot.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm/dts/k3-am65x-binman.dtsi | 551 ++++++++++++++++++
board/ti/am65x/Kconfig | 2 +
4 files changed, 555 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-am65x-binman.dtsi
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Is there any way that these boards could share a .dtsi with just the
different bits in each board's dtsi? There seems to be a lot of
duplicate.
Maybe a common k3-binman.dtsi, but the common nodes (where the filenames
of both the generated file as well as component files are all common)
would be the ti-board-config ones... and if we change that as per last
review comment to point to board/ti/<device>/config.bin then we'd have
that particular to each device as well right?
Or do you mean to say we use #defines for all?
Regards,
Simon
--
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis
