On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:34:53 -0400 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:25:13AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Pali, > > > > On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 01:07, Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 25 April 2023 19:04:10 Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Pali, > > > > > > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 10:28, Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Monday 24 April 2023 17:08:32 Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > This creates a lot of errors of the form: > > > > > > > > > > > > `__stack_chk_fail' referenced in section `.text' of ...ltrans.o: > > > > > > defined > > > > > > in discarded section `.text' of common/stackprot.o (symbol from > > > > > > plugin) > > > > > > > > > > This issue should be rather fixed... > > > > > > > > > > > Drop LTO for now. > > > > > > > > > > ... and until it happens is not CONFIG_LTO for disabling enough? > > > > > > > > > > LTO does not work for more other boards / platforms and it is just > > > > > _not_ > > > > > enabled via CONFIG_LTO in those cases... > > > > > > > > The thing is, LTO is enabled for sandbox normally (clang and gcc). It > > > > is just the MSYS2 platform where there are problems. > > > > > > So what about having CONFIG_LTO by default 'n' for CONFIG_MSYS2? > > > > But that would require creating a new board. I am trying to use the > > same board, just building it in a different environment. > > I think we need to make CONFIG_LTO depend on CC_IS_GCC for now as it > also doesn't work (but could be addressed) for CC_IS_CLANG. > It got broken? It should work at least for sandbox... Marek
