On 6/8/23 17:16, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@foss.st.com>
> 
> As stm32prog_get_tee_partitions() is no more used, remove tee_detected
> boolean from stm32prog_data struct and all code using it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@foss.st.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/cmd_stm32prog.c |  9 ---------
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.c     | 11 -----------
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.h     |  3 ---
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32prog.h      |  4 ----
>  4 files changed, 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/cmd_stm32prog.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/cmd_stm32prog.c
> index cfafa539aeb9..c695cc11232b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/cmd_stm32prog.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/cmd_stm32prog.c
> @@ -180,15 +180,6 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(stm32prog, 5, 0, do_stm32prog,
>          "  <size> = size of flashlayout (optional for image with STM32 
> header)\n"
>  );
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STM32MP15x_STM32IMAGE
> -bool stm32prog_get_tee_partitions(void)
> -{
> -     if (stm32prog_data)
> -             return stm32prog_data->tee_detected;
> -
> -     return false;
> -}
> -#endif
>  
>  bool stm32prog_get_fsbl_nor(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.c
> index 241ad40abb7c..0cdc14dd5bc8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.c
> @@ -995,9 +995,6 @@ static int treat_partition_list(struct stm32prog_data 
> *data)
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&data->dev[j].part_list);
>       }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STM32MP15x_STM32IMAGE
> -     data->tee_detected = false;
> -#endif
>       data->fsbl_nor_detected = false;
>       for (i = 0; i < data->part_nb; i++) {
>               part = &data->part_array[i];
> @@ -1049,14 +1046,6 @@ static int treat_partition_list(struct stm32prog_data 
> *data)
>                           !strncmp(part->name, "fsbl", 4))
>                               data->fsbl_nor_detected = true;
>                       /* fallthrough */
> -             case STM32PROG_NAND:
> -             case STM32PROG_SPI_NAND:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STM32MP15x_STM32IMAGE
> -                     if (!data->tee_detected &&
> -                         !strncmp(part->name, "tee", 3))
> -                             data->tee_detected = true;
> -                     break;
> -#endif
>               default:
>                       break;
>               }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.h 
> b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.h
> index 58f4b96fa752..04a899ee1184 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cmd_stm32prog/stm32prog.h
> @@ -149,9 +149,6 @@ struct stm32prog_data {
>       struct stm32prog_dev_t  dev[STM32PROG_MAX_DEV]; /* array of device */
>       int                     part_nb;        /* nb of partition */
>       struct stm32prog_part_t *part_array;    /* array of partition */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STM32MP15x_STM32IMAGE
> -     bool                    tee_detected;
> -#endif
>       bool                    fsbl_nor_detected;
>  
>       /* command internal information */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32prog.h 
> b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32prog.h
> index 99be4e1d656b..23d1adfbad92 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32prog.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32prog.h
> @@ -11,8 +11,4 @@ int stm32prog_read_medium_virt(struct dfu_entity *dfu, u64 
> offset,
>                              void *buf, long *len);
>  int stm32prog_get_medium_size_virt(struct dfu_entity *dfu, u64 *size);
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STM32MP15x_STM32IMAGE
> -bool stm32prog_get_tee_partitions(void);
> -#endif
> -
>  bool stm32prog_get_fsbl_nor(void);
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@foss.st.com>

Thanks
Patrice

Reply via email to