On 15.06.23 13:19, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 12:09, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote: >> >> On 15.06.23 12:55, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 11:26, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12.06.23 23:17, Simon Glass wrote: >>>>> Hi Jan, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 15:39, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> Introduce BINMAN_EXTRA_ARGS that can be set per board, e.g., to inject >>>>>> specific settings. Will be used by IOT2050 first to define multiple >>>>>> of-lists. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> CC: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Makefile | 1 + >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >>>>> I'm really not keen on this, since it means that the Makefile (or some >>>>> vars it sets) are again involved in controlling the image generation. >>>>> It should really all be in the binman image description / .dtsi file >>>> >>>> binman does not allow me to unrole of-list inside the dts file, does it? >>>> With such a feature, I wouldn't need any custom -a of-list-X switches >>>> and, thus, no such EXTRA_ARGS. >>> >>> Can you explain a bit more about what you mean by 'unrole'? It is just >>> software, so anything should be possible. >> >> To use a DT sequence, I need to specify fit,ftd-list. But I can say >> >> fit,ftd-list = "first.dtb second.dtb" >> >> I rather need to go via the EntryArg indirection of the binman command line. > > Do you mean you would rather not use '-a CONFIG_OF_LIST'. Or are you > wanting to filter that list based on something else? > > I'm afraid I am really not following this at all.
CONFIG_OF_LIST is not working here as we have two different boards with two different lists. Jan -- Siemens AG, Technology Competence Center Embedded Linux