On 6/19/23 20:27, Detlev Casanova wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 12:11:18 P.M. EDT Marek Vasut wrote:
On 6/19/23 16:42, Detlev Casanova wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 8:43:33 P.M. EDT Marek Vasut wrote:
On 6/16/23 17:21, Detlev Casanova wrote:
Expose that information to the command shell to let scripts select the
correct devicetree name.
Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casan...@collabora.com>
---
drivers/sysinfo/rcar3.c | 46
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/sysinfo/rcar3.c b/drivers/sysinfo/rcar3.c
index 7b127986da7..89ad46c5422 100644
--- a/drivers/sysinfo/rcar3.c
+++ b/drivers/sysinfo/rcar3.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
*/
struct sysinfo_rcar_priv {
char boardmodel[64];
+ u8 id;
+ char revision[4];
u8 val;
};
@@ -48,17 +50,37 @@ static int sysinfo_rcar_get_str(struct udevice *dev,
int id, size_t size, char *>
switch (id) {
case SYSINFO_ID_BOARD_MODEL:
- strncpy(val, priv->boardmodel, size);
- val[size - 1] = '\0';
+ strlcpy(val, priv->boardmodel, size);
+ break;
+ case SYSINFO_ID_BOARD_REVISION:
+ strlcpy(val, priv->revision, size);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ };
+
+ val[size - 1] = '\0';
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sysinfo_rcar_get_int(struct udevice *dev, int id, int *val)
+{
+ struct sysinfo_rcar_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+
+ switch (id) {
+ case SYSINFO_ID_BOARD_ID:
+ *val = priv->id;
return 0;
Why not return SYSINFO_ID_BOARD_REVISION as integer here ?
Because the revision (on r-car3 boards at least) is in the format X.Y. It
could be returned as "(X << 8) | Y" or split in major/minor. But different
boards will use different revisions and I think that having a str is
easier to deal with in a shell script.
With rcar they are numbers, so lets go with major/minor integers please.
Ok for this part, but shouldn't the sysinfo command use a common interface for
all boards ? Or should it also have rev_major/rev_minor arguments ?
I would expect other boards to either report rev_major/rev_minor if
implemented, or errno if those boards don't implement this property.
