23 червня 2023 р. 14:32:30 GMT+03:00, Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com>
написав(-ла):
>On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 08:55:57AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>[...]
>> diff --git a/board/asus/transformer-t30/pinmux-config-transformer.h
>> b/board/asus/transformer-t30/pinmux-config-transformer.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..96ff45d375
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/board/asus/transformer-t30/pinmux-config-transformer.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2010-2013, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Svyatoslav Ryhel.
>> + */
>
>I don't recall if we discussed this during upstreaming of the Linux
>device tree files, but shortly after the initial support for Tegra20 and
>Tegra30 was upstreamed (both in U-Boot and in Linux) we decided to move
>towards generating the pinmux configuration for the various consumers
>(i.e. U-Boot and Linux) from data tables using a set of scripts. This
>was done because we noticed that various inconsistencies kept creeping
>into the various drivers/tables.
>
>You can find the scripts for this here:
>
> https://github.com/NVIDIA/tegra-pinmux-scripts
>
>I think there'd be some benefit if these new boards were also converted
>to use these scripts.
True, but there is no driver for pinmux which can utilize device tree, instead
u-boot relies on board header. I see the benefit of these pinmux nodes only if
I can verify that they are correct and do not brake devices. Would be really
bad if at some point devices brake cause nodes were not tested.
Additionally, shouldn't all supported boards be converted first?
Best regards,
Svyatoslav R.
>Thierry
