On 6/26/23 11:52, Marek Vasut wrote:
To avoid SRAM overflow in the SPL build, use simple malloc implementation.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
---
Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hris...@collabora.com>
---
configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig
b/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig
index 6b7e308680e..185694d4319 100644
--- a/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig
+++ b/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE=0x10000
CONFIG_SPL_HAS_BSS_LINKER_SECTION=y
CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR=0x20000000
CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE=0x80000
+CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y
# CONFIG_SPL_SHARES_INIT_SP_ADDR is not set
CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC=y
CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE=0x80000
why is the email patch arriving after patch was already applied? not to
say that it was applied so fast and without going through at91 tree.
