Hi Tom and Simon, On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:40 AM Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 at 11:29, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 05:29:40PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:14 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:04 PM Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This series adds a simple bootmeth for ChromiumOS on x86. It uses > > > > > zimage > > > > > to boot the kernel. > > > > > > > > > > Full verified boot is not included at this stage - that is still a > > > > > separate chunk of code to be brought into standard boot at some point. > > > > > For now it just obtains the kernel and command line and boots. This > > > > > should > > > > > be enough to boot Chrome OS from coreboot on all x86 machines in > > > > > circulation, although only Brya (2022) and Coral (2017) have been > > > > > tested. > > > > > > > > > > ChromiumOS needs quite large kernel parameters, to hold the DM verity > > > > > settings and other pieces. This makes it painful to modify just one > > > > > parameter, since the whole cmdline must be adjusted at once. To cope > > > > > with > > > > > this, a new cmdline-editing feature is provided: the 'bootflow > > > > > cmdline' > > > > > command allows individual parameters to be added, modified and > > > > > deleted. > > > > > > > > > > To deal with enabling debug console, a variant supports setting > > > > > 'earlycon' > > > > > and 'console' automatically. The 'bdinfo' command is updated to show > > > > > serial-port info also. > > > > > > > > > > Booting the zimage is now done programmatically, rather than running > > > > > through the command-line interface. Minor tweaks are made to the > > > > > coreboot > > > > > and coral config so that booting works correctly. > > > > > > > > > > Note that the ACPI tables are not updated with the required firmware > > > > > information in this series, so a warning is shown on boot. This will > > > > > be > > > > > addressed later since it requires quite a bit of configuration. > > > > > > > > > > Finally, this fixes a recently introduced bug in unit testing and > > > > > updates > > > > > the algorithm to avoid running flat-tree tests which don't actually > > > > > use > > > > > the devicetree. > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > > - Drop CONFIG_MISC and CONFIG_NVMEM > > > > > - Update commit message > > > > > - Separate out patch to restore test behaviour on failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > series applied to u-boot-x86, thanks! > > > > > > Could you please look at the CI failure? > > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-x86/-/pipelines/16890/failures > > > > I _think_ if you rebase on master this should be fixed with > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230712024632.2365887-1-...@chromium.org/ > > applied. > > Yes it should be. >
Rebased u-boot-x86 against u-boot/master, but CI still has these sandbox failures. https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-x86/-/pipelines/16920/failures Regards, Bin