Hi Tom,
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 07:23, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 03:16:38PM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 04:26, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:52:38PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 02:58, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Support has being added through earlier commits to build capsules
> > > > > and embed the public key needed for capsule authentication as part of
> > > > > u-boot build.
> > > > >
> > > > > From the testing point-of-view, this means the input files needed for
> > > > > generating the above have to be setup before invoking the build. Set
> > > > > this up in the CI configuration docker file for testing the capsule
> > > > > update feature.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes since V4:
> > > > > * New patch which moves the setting up of the files needed for testing
> > > > > the EFI capsule update feature to the Dockerfile.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note: Earlier, this setup was being done in the azure and gitlab yaml
> > > > > files. Now that this has been moved to the Dockerfile, this will
> > > > > require generating a new container image and referencing that image in
> > > > > the yaml files for the CI to work when these patches get applied.
> > > > >
> > > > > tools/docker/Dockerfile | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/tools/docker/Dockerfile b/tools/docker/Dockerfile
> > > > > index 3d2b64a355..294a0b0a53 100644
> > > > > --- a/tools/docker/Dockerfile
> > > > > +++ b/tools/docker/Dockerfile
> > > > > @@ -206,6 +206,18 @@ RUN mkdir -p /opt/nokia && \
> > > > > cp /tmp/qemu-linaro/arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm /opt/nokia &&
> > > > > \
> > > > > rm -rf /tmp/qemu-linaro
> > > > >
> > > > > +# Set up capsule files for UEFI capsule update testing
> > > > > +RUN mkdir -p /tmp/capsules && \
> > > > > + cd /tmp/capsules/ && \
> > > >
> > > > You can just use ${UBOOT_TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR} here
> > >
> > > That's not present in Dockerfiles, only at runtime within jobs (because
> > > we set it).
> >
> > I can copy the files into UBOOT_TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR as part of the job,
> > similar to what is being done for the grub*.efi files.
>
> Yes, copying the files rather than relying on them being in /tmp is
> better, but..
>
> > > > > + echo -n "u-boot:Old" > u-boot.bin.old && \
> > > > > + echo -n "u-boot:New" > u-boot.bin.new && \
> > > > > + echo -n "u-boot-env:Old" > u-boot.env.old && \
> > > > > + echo -n "u-boot-env:New" > u-boot.env.new && \
> > > >
> > > > We don't want these files, just the certs, since they are the things
> > > > that take a long time:
> > > >
> > > > > + openssl req -x509 -sha256 -newkey rsa:2048 -subj
> > > > > /CN=TEST_SIGNER/ -keyout SIGNER.key -out SIGNER.crt -nodes -days 365
> > > > > && \
> > > > > + openssl req -x509 -sha256 -newkey rsa:2048 -subj
> > > > > /CN=TEST_SIGNER/ -keyout SIGNER2.key -out SIGNER2.crt -nodes -days
> > > > > 365 && \
> > > > > + cert-to-efi-sig-list SIGNER.crt SIGNER.esl && \
> > > > > + chmod -R uog+rw /tmp/capsules/
> > >
> > > How long does it even take to make these certs? I'm not sure it's great
> > > to make these and stage them in /tmp and expect them to be around at
> > > test time.
> >
> > Should I mimic what is being done for the various grub.efi files? I
> > believe that these are in the /opt/grub/ directory of the docker
> > image, and get copied to the build dir at runtime.
>
> It takes 10 minutes or so to build grub, and we use it in multiple
> tests. Running openssl takes not even a second. Why are we doing this
> in the Dockerfile? Is this needed in more than one test? If so, does it
> matter if we have the same certs in each test?
Yes it is actually much faster that I expected, so I suppose we can go
back to having it in the test itself, e.g. in a pytest fixture.
Regards,
Simon
