On 10:15-20230726, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:26:05AM +0530, Ravi Gunasekaran wrote: > > On 7/25/23 11:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 09:09:34AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > >> On 15:56-20230725, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:58:56AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > >>>> Update the am62 and am625 device-trees from linux v6.3-rc5 This needed > > >>>> the followin > > >>>> tweaks to the u-boot specific dtsi as well: > > >>>> - Switch tick-timer to the main_timer as it's now defined in the main > > >>>> dtsi > > >>>> - Secure proxies are defined in Soc dtsis > > >>>> - Drop duplicate nodes - u-boot.dtsi is includes in r5-sk, no need for > > >>>> either the definitions from main.dtsi OR duplication from u-boot.dtsi > > >>>> - Add mdio pins to the cpsw3g pinctrl in u-boot dtsi. It moved to a > > >>>> subnode in the > > >>>> linux dtsi that u-boot doesn't use/support > > >>>> > > >>>> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <france...@dolcini.it> > > >>>> Cc: Sjoerd Simons <sjo...@collabora.com> > > >>>> Cc: Wadim Egorov <w.ego...@phytec.de> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> > > >>>> --- > > >>>> > > >>>> I decided not to pick up changes from Roger and Maxime as they are'nt > > >>>> regression fixes, instead the fixups can be done on top of the basic > > >>>> sync. > > >>> > > >>> This breaks Linux network interfaces so I very much considers this a > > >>> regression. > > >> The current u-boot.dtsi I am confused - pinctrl mdio is still a > > >> problem, is'nt it? > > >> https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/master/arch/arm/dts/k3-am625-sk-u-boot.dtsi#L132 > > >> The follow on fixups from both your and Roger's series should fix things > > >> up, correct? > > > > > > I'm a little confused here too. For each of these cases, what happens? > > > - Today, one of these platforms, we pass the kernel the in-memory U-Boot > > > device tree. And if this is functional for networking, how/why? > > > > In here, the mdio pinctrl configuration is present only in one node (CPSW). > > So there is no conflict when the in-memory DT is passed by U-Boot to kernel. > > > > > - "Tomorrow", one of these platforms, with Nishanth's series applied, we > > > pass the in-memory U-Boot device tree > > > > In this case, the DT passed by U-Boot has the mdio pinctrl info present in > > two nodes - one in CPSW and other in MDIO. This causes failure in Linux as > > both nodes refer to same pinctrl configuration. > > Yeah, exactly. The "Tomorrow" case probably makes it functional for > U-Boot but breaks Linux in the process. It was functional in Linux > before because it has everything needed to set up the network and didn't > rely on U-Boot for that at all. >
https://github.com/nmenon/fix-k3-dt-u-boot/commits/fdt-fixup-s1-am625-rev3.1 If we are willing to add the dependency of: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724-ti-mdio-pinmux-v4-1-18541f976...@kernel.org https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230722193151.117345-2-rog...@kernel.org https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230722193151.117345-3-rog...@kernel.org Tom, I need some guidance here - i can squash the fixup if the dependencies queued. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D