On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 04:40, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 18. August 2023 02:26:50 MESZ schrieb Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>:
> >It is not always the case that U-Boot builds the ACPI tables itself. For
> >example, when booting from coreboot, the ACPI tables are built by
> >coreboot.
> >
> >Correct the Makefile condition so that U-Boot can pass on tables built
> >by a previous firmware stage.
> >
> >Tidy up the installation-condition code while we are here.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> >---
> >
> >Changes in v2:
> >- Add new patch
> >
> > lib/efi_loader/Makefile | 2 +-
> > lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> >index 1a8c8d7cab5c..0eb748ff1a59 100644
> >--- a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> >+++ b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> >@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_ESRT) += efi_esrt.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO) += efi_gop.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BLK) += efi_disk.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_NETDEVICES) += efi_net.o
> >-obj-$(CONFIG_GENERATE_ACPI_TABLE) += efi_acpi.o
> >+obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += efi_acpi.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_GENERATE_SMBIOS_TABLE) += efi_smbios.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL) += efi_rng.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL) += efi_tcg2.o
> >diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c
> >index 58d4e1340233..ad719afd6328 100644
> >--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c
> >+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c
> >@@ -321,11 +321,11 @@ efi_status_t efi_init_obj_list(void)
> > if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > goto out;
> > #endif
> >-#ifdef CONFIG_GENERATE_ACPI_TABLE
> >- ret = efi_acpi_register();
> >- if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >- goto out;
> >-#endif
> >+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) {
> >+ ret = efi_acpi_register();
> >+ if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >+ goto out;
> >+ }
> > #ifdef CONFIG_GENERATE_SMBIOS_TABLE
>
> Shouldn't this become CONFIG_SMBIOS?
This is renamed on a later patch
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org>
>
> It would help my review work if you would stop suppressing half of your patch
> series when sending mails.
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> > ret = efi_smbios_register();
> > if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
