On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:34:17 -0700
Sam Edwards <cfswo...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Sam,

> This is to prepare for R528, which does not have the typical
> "CPUCFG" block; it has a "CPUX" block which provides these
> same functions but is organized differently.
> 
> Moving the hardware-access bits to their own functions separates the
> logic from the hardware so we can reuse the same logic.

That's a very nice cleanup, thanks for doing that!

Another one of those hard-to-reason-about diffs, but I placed the register
access back into the place of the new function call, somewhat playing your
patch backwards, manually, and that ended up at a very similar code to
before the patch, so I think it's legit.
Again, needs some testing, but looks good from a diff point of view.

Two smaller things, with them fixed:

> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <cfswo...@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>

Cheers,
Andre

> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> index 7804e0933b..e2845f21ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void __secure clamp_set(u32 *clamp)
>       writel(0xff, clamp);
>  }
>  
> -static void __secure sunxi_set_entry_address(void *entry)
> +static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_entry(int __always_unused cpu, void 
> *entry)

So what is the reasoning behind this change?
If *none* of the Allwinner SoCs have independent secondary entry point
registers, we should not give the impression some do in the prototype.
Should later a SoC emerge that changes this, adjusting this one is the
least of our problems then.

>  {
>       /* secondary core entry address is programmed differently on R40 */
>       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R40)) {
> @@ -148,30 +148,60 @@ static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_power(int cpu, bool 
> on)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -void __secure sunxi_cpu_power_off(u32 cpuid)
> +static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_reset(int cpu, bool reset)
> +{
> +     struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> +             (struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> +
> +     writel(reset ? 0b00 : 0b11, &cpucfg->cpu[cpu].rst);
> +}
> +
> +static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_locking(int cpu, bool lock)
>  {
>       struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
>               (struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> +
> +     if (lock)
> +             clrbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +     else
> +             setbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +}
> +
> +static bool __secure sunxi_cpu_poll_wfi(int cpu)
> +{
> +     struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> +             (struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> +
> +     return !!(readl(&cpucfg->cpu[cpu].status) & BIT(2));
> +}
> +
> +static void __secure sunxi_cpu_invalidate_cache(int cpu)
> +{
> +     struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> +             (struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> +
> +     clrbits_le32(&cpucfg->gen_ctrl, BIT(cpu));
> +}
> +
> +void __secure sunxi_cpu_power_off(u32 cpuid)

Can you please mark this as static on the way? That does not seem to be
used anywhere, and even the name suggests it's local.
Saves 8 bytes of .text ;-)

> +{
>       u32 cpu = cpuid & 0x3;
>  
>       /* Wait for the core to enter WFI */
> -     while (1) {
> -             if (readl(&cpucfg->cpu[cpu].status) & BIT(2))
> -                     break;
> +     while (!sunxi_cpu_poll_wfi(cpu))
>               __mdelay(1);
> -     }
>  
>       /* Assert reset on target CPU */
> -     writel(0, &cpucfg->cpu[cpu].rst);
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_reset(cpu, true);
>  
>       /* Lock CPU (Disable external debug access) */
> -     clrbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_locking(cpu, true);
>  
>       /* Power down CPU */
>       sunxi_cpu_set_power(cpuid, false);
>  
> -     /* Unlock CPU (Disable external debug access) */
> -     setbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +     /* Unlock CPU (Reenable external debug access) */
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_locking(cpu, false);
>  }
>  
>  static u32 __secure cp15_read_scr(void)
> @@ -228,33 +258,31 @@ out:
>  int __secure psci_cpu_on(u32 __always_unused unused, u32 mpidr, u32 pc,
>                        u32 context_id)
>  {
> -     struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> -             (struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
>       u32 cpu = (mpidr & 0x3);
>  
>       /* store target PC and context id */
>       psci_save(cpu, pc, context_id);
>  
>       /* Set secondary core power on PC */
> -     sunxi_set_entry_address(&psci_cpu_entry);
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_entry(cpu, &psci_cpu_entry);
>  
>       /* Assert reset on target CPU */
> -     writel(0, &cpucfg->cpu[cpu].rst);
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_reset(cpu, true);
>  
>       /* Invalidate L1 cache */
> -     clrbits_le32(&cpucfg->gen_ctrl, BIT(cpu));
> +     sunxi_cpu_invalidate_cache(cpu);
>  
>       /* Lock CPU (Disable external debug access) */
> -     clrbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_locking(cpu, true);
>  
>       /* Power up target CPU */
>       sunxi_cpu_set_power(cpu, true);
>  
>       /* De-assert reset on target CPU */
> -     writel(BIT(1) | BIT(0), &cpucfg->cpu[cpu].rst);
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_reset(cpu, false);
>  
> -     /* Unlock CPU (Disable external debug access) */
> -     setbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +     /* Unlock CPU (Reenable external debug access) */
> +     sunxi_cpu_set_locking(cpu, false);
>  
>       return ARM_PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
>  }

Reply via email to