On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 02:47:11PM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> 
> 
> 23 серпня 2023 р. 14:17:37 GMT+03:00, Thierry Reding 
> <thierry.red...@gmail.com> написав(-ла):
> >On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 02:22:15PM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >> Remove of TrustZone nodes is required by many product devices
> >> which require repetable calls of same function from device board.
> >> To simplify this, TZ remove is converted into Kconfig option.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamo...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig    | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/dt-setup.c |  7 +++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> >I kind of preferred the original because it's very explicit. There's
> >also no big advantage in consolidating this because the code is unlikely
> >to ever require changing (the libfdt API is quite stable and these nodes
> >are all hard-coded anyway). This new variant put non-generic code (it
> >requires a Kconfig option after all) into a generic place, so it seems a
> >bit backwards.
> 
> So you say that I have to add same function to boards over and over
> for all devices I plan to mainline? Unneeded code duplication in
> action.

There's a balance to be struck between duplication and readability. If
you insert this board-specific code into a generic code path, that
generic code path becomes difficult to read given the extra #ifdef
guards etc. If you're really worried about duplicating code you can move
the two libfdt calls into a separate function and call that function
from each of the boards that need it.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to