On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 04:25:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 04:17:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 02:06:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:23:32PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Each board has its own way of creating this table. Rather than calling
> > > > the
> > > > acpi_create_fadt() function for each one from a common acpi_write_fadt()
> > > > function, just move the writer into the board-specific code.
> > >
> > > No luck, but I have a bit of time to debug more.
> >
> > Okay, after your patch even U-Boot can't see those tables
> >
> > => acpi list
> > Name Base Size Detail
> > ---- -------- ----- ------
> > RSDP 000e4500 24 v02 U-BOOT
> > RSDT 000e4530 34 v01 U-BOOT U-BOOTBL 20231001 INTL 0
> > XSDT 000e45e0 44 v01 U-BOOT U-BOOTBL 20231001 INTL 0
> > CSRT 000e5490 58 v00 U-BOOT U-BOOTBL 20231001 INTL 0
> > MCFG 000e5610 3c v01 U-BOOT U-BOOTBL 20231001 INTL 0
> > SPCR 000e5650 50 v02 U-BOOT U-BOOTBL 20231001 INTL 0
> > APIC 000e56a0 48 v02 U-BOOT U-BOOTBL 20231001 INTL 0
> >
> > Because the base is badly corrupted:
> >
> > -00000030: 52 53 44 54 38 00 00 00 01 95 55 2d 42 4f 4f 54 RSDT8.....U-BOOT
> > +00000030: 52 53 44 54 34 00 00 00 01 eb 55 2d 42 4f 4f 54 RSDT4.....U-BOOT
>
> Length -4 bytes, another checksum as a result.
>
> > -00000050: 00 00 00 00 90 54 0e 00 f0 54 0e 00 10 56 0e 00 .....T...T...V..
> > +00000050: 00 00 00 00 90 54 0e 00 10 56 0e 00 50 56 0e 00 .....T...V..PV..
>
> Missing pointer to 0x0e54f0 which is... FADT!
>
> > -00000060: 50 56 0e 00 a0 56 0e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 PV...V..........
> > +00000060: a0 56 0e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .V..............
> >
> > -000000e0: 58 53 44 54 4c 00 00 00 01 7b 55 2d 42 4f 4f 54 XSDTL....{U-BOOT
> > +000000e0: 58 53 44 54 44 00 00 00 01 d5 55 2d 42 4f 4f 54 XSDTD.....U-BOOT
>
> Wrong length, another checksum.
>
> > -00000100: 00 00 00 00 90 54 0e 00 00 00 00 00 f0 54 0e 00 .....T.......T..
> > +00000100: 00 00 00 00 90 54 0e 00 00 00 00 00 10 56 0e 00 .....T.......V..
> >
> > -00000110: 00 00 00 00 10 56 0e 00 00 00 00 00 50 56 0e 00 .....V......PV..
> > +00000110: 00 00 00 00 50 56 0e 00 00 00 00 00 a0 56 0e 00 ....PV.......V..
> >
> > -00000120: 00 00 00 00 a0 56 0e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .....V..........
> > +00000120: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>
> Same reason. So, your code forgot to link FADT to the main tables.
By code analysis you simply missed
+ acpi_add_table(ctx, fadt);
I'm going to check this right now... Stay tuned!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
