Kojima-san, [...] > /* Carve out DT reserved memory ranges */ > void efi_carve_out_dt_rsv(void *fdt); > /* Purge unused kaslr-seed */ > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c > index 605be5041e..4991056946 100644 > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c > @@ -326,6 +326,11 @@ static efi_status_t try_load_from_uri_path(struct > efi_device_path_uri *uridp, > return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER; > > ret = load_default_file_from_blk_dev(blk, handle); > + if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) > + return ret; > + > + /* whole ramdisk must be reserved */ > + efi_reserve_memory(image_addr, image_size, true);
Why is this a different patch though? My concern is code duplication when we add similar functionality in eficonfig. Isn't there a better place to handle the memory reservation? [...] Thanks /Ilias
