Hi Raymond,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 15:15, Raymond Mao <raymond....@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 04:58, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Standard passage provides for a bloblist to be passed from one firmware
> > phase to the next. That can be used to pass the devicetree along as well.
> > Add an option to support this.
> >
> > Tests for this will be added as part of the Universal Payload work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - No changes as it still seems unclear what should be done
> >
> [...]
> > diff --git a/include/bloblist.h b/include/bloblist.h
> > index 080cc46a1266..e16d122f4fb1 100644
> > --- a/include/bloblist.h
> > +++ b/include/bloblist.h
> > @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ enum bloblist_tag_t {
> > BLOBLISTT_ACPI_TABLES = 0x104, /* ACPI tables for x86 */
> > BLOBLISTT_SMBIOS_TABLES = 0x105, /* SMBIOS tables for x86 */
> > BLOBLISTT_VBOOT_CTX = 0x106, /* Chromium OS verified boot context */
> > + /*
> > + * Devicetree for use by firmware. On some platforms this is passed to
> > + * the OS also
> > + */
> > + BLOBLISTT_CONTROL_FDT = 0x107,
> Shall we re-define all the `BLOBLISTT_` tags according to the firmware handoff
> spec v0.9?
> According to the latest discussion (in
> https://github.com/FirmwareHandoff/firmware_handoff/pull/19)
> It is preferred that generic ones to start from `0`, and Arm specific ones
> starts
> from `0x100`.
> In this case, the FDT should be re-defined as `1` and other existing non-arm
> ones (e.g. for x86 or Chromium OS) should have their placeholder before
> `0xff_f000`,
> while generic ones (e.g. for TPM) should be placed somewhere between `0`
> and `0x100`.
>
> [...]
>
Sure, if you like. I'm a little unclear when that stuff will land. We
can always update the tag numbering along with the format changes.
Regards,
Simon
