On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:22:37PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:23:51PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > > > As discussed this series reverts the HAFDBS changes that caused an issue > > > on AC5/AC5X. I think there are some improvements that can be made to the > > > initial memory map for the AC5/AC5X but so far nothing I've found makes > > > it compatible with the HAFDBS changes. > > > > Would you mind briefly explaining what those issues are and/or point me to > > the > > discussion where it was decided to revert these patches? > > > > The feature is quite useful for users of CONFIG_CMO_BY_VA_ONLY, to speed up > > the > > boot sequence: instead of reverting these patches altogether, would a > > reasonable > > alternative be to put them behind a build option? > > > > Also, could you confirm that the "initial memory map" you are referring to > > above > > only describes actual memory as, IIRC, some boards were using mappings > > **much** > > larger than their DRAM address space? > > The most details are in this thread: > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFOYHZC_Dveax85n0fLr5BFyZcLqsvUssn=j0ohyvn75bta...@mail.gmail.com/ > with some follow-up in: > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFOYHZB7jJWwD24oWzx6u55w2whHYjK56f=qyn0lwu4z8ds...@mail.gmail.com/
Checking to see if you have any feedback for these platforms? I would like to have them working again one way or another in v2024.01, thanks. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
