Hi Tom, On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 at 11:44, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:58:50AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > [snip] > > I found these: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=262148&state=* > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210925121958.26001-1-p...@kernel.org/ > > > > IMO the second one from Pali makes sense, but it was never followed > > up. It doesn't look too difficult. > > > > We should have a policy that if people complain about a patch but > > don't follow up, we apply the patch we have. > > I think the patch from Pali was the right direction, but as I noted, I > wanted to see it implemented for some other UARTs as well, and it wasn't > high on anyone elses priority list. Covering ns16550-style UARTs too > would be good.
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/issues/28 Regards, Simon
