Sorry for being late, On 03/24/2011 01:37 AM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > 2011/3/23 Shinya Kuribayashi <skuri...@pobox.com>: > Following changes have been introduced to ld in binutils-2.16: [...] > I'd claim that all toolchains with binutils lesser than 2.16 are not > working anymore. [...] >>> I suggest to drop official support for ELDK-3.1.1 / binutils-2.14 and >>> earlier.
Excellent, no comments from me. Let's forget about all pre-binutils 2.16 releases from now on, and ELDK-3.1.1 as well. > I have prepared a v3 of this patch that checks whether -mips32r2 is > supported. If not than -mips32 will be used as fallback. But I want > to clarify this first before I send it. I'm guessting you're worried that the corresponding line will differ from what the Linux/MIPS has, but that's not a problem. The Linux/MIPS tries to tighten the condition in accordance with explicit configuration options such as CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R1/R2, CONFIG_CPU_MIPS64_R1/R2. > cflags-$(CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R1) += $(call > cc-option,-march=mips32,-mips32 -U_MIPS_ISA -D_MIPS_ISA=_MIPS_ISA_MIPS32) \ > -Wa,-mips32 -Wa,--trap > cflags-$(CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R2) += $(call > cc-option,-march=mips32r2,-mips32r2 -U_MIPS_ISA -D_MIPS_ISA=_MIPS_ISA_MIPS32) > \ > -Wa,-mips32r2 -Wa,--trap > cflags-$(CONFIG_CPU_MIPS64_R1) += $(call > cc-option,-march=mips64,-mips64 -U_MIPS_ISA -D_MIPS_ISA=_MIPS_ISA_MIPS64) \ > -Wa,-mips64 -Wa,--trap > cflags-$(CONFIG_CPU_MIPS64_R2) += $(call > cc-option,-march=mips64r2,-mips64r2 -U_MIPS_ISA -D_MIPS_ISA=_MIPS_ISA_MIPS64) > \ > -Wa,-mips64r2 -Wa,--trap We U-Boot doesn't have to follow this convention, and can relax the cc- option rules. I'll wait for v3 patch(es), and push them during the next merge window. Thanks in advance, _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
