On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:27:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 27.12.23 13:39, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Everyone! > >>> > >>> This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device > >>> tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. > >>> > >>> The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 > >>> files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs > >>> should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which > >>> is fairly similar to the am65x. > >>> > >>> For those interested in what UART boot looks like: > >>> https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc > >>> > >>> Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays > >>> ~Bryan > >> > >> For the series, > >> Tested-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > >> > >> Nishanth, does this path work for you? > >> > > > > Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, > > > > The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. > > > > k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi > > k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi > > k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi > > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi > > k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts > > > > Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is > > posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on. > > > > We currently plan to sync once support for the new SM variant is in the > upstream DT. Do you see other changes that would benefit from an earlier > sync?
So this sync is because the ref platforms at least do not boot, is iot2050 currently booting? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature