On 14:48-20240109, Tom Rini wrote:
[...]
> > > -- 
> > > 2.34.1
> > > 
> > 
> > Why not a config fragment?
> 
> To me, this makes sense to keep in the main config. It can be turned off
> as needed, and at run time if it's not present, it's safe.

Three reasons:
* There is going to be duplication across multiple boards
* It confuses the affair of trying to find the minimal configuration needed
  to boot the board.
* SRAM is limited already - we have been playing all kind of dances
  around this - NAND is a daughter card addon - while I am not trying to
  diminish NAND support, we are in a constant struggle to keep SRAM
  viable and adding additional boot modes to a single config, IMHO is
  the wrong direction to go.


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 
849D 1736 249D

Reply via email to