York, > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:41 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote: >>> I am sorry I totally ignored the subject with mpc83xx. I was thinking of >>> mpc85xx. >> ok - no "new" code for 83xx then. >>> You are right the old code is in spd_sdram.c and it is still in use for >>> mpc83xx. Unless to adjust the code, there is no board specific file. >>> >> Are you willing to accept some changes to spd_sdram.c or will I have >> another out-of-tree board ? >> >> What we need is : >> >> - more configurable settings like driver strength, cpo and odt values. >> - Reading SPD data from an arbitrary i2c eeprom. >> >> What's so bad about my proposal ? >> Please let me know so that I'm able to improve. >> > I welcome the change to use the new code since the feature you asked is > already there. sorry, but I'm not sure if I understand this correctly.
What I need is some minor non-intrusive changes to 83xx-specific file spd_sdram.c because it is the most straightforward solution with *no* impact on code size or other existing boards. So: The feature I ask for is *not* already there. What I definitely won't do is use the "new" fsl ddr code in mpc8xxx/ddr because it completely lacks 83xx support. So: The feature I ask for is there but my CPU family is not supported. IMHO the "new" code is total overkill for 83xx. Cheers, André MATRIX VISION GmbH, Talstrasse 16, DE-71570 Oppenweiler Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 271090 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Gerhard Thullner, Werner Armingeon, Uwe Furtner _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot