On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 08:52:30PM +0530, Devarsh Thakkar wrote: > Hi Tom, Lukas, > > Thanks for the patch Lukas. > > On 20/03/24 20:00, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 02:19:26PM +0100, lukas.funke-...@weidmueller.com > > wrote: > > > >> From: Lukas Funke <lukas.fu...@weidmueller.com> > >> > >> Some architectures use spl_board_init() in their architecture specific > >> implementation. Board developers should be able to add board specific > >> implementation via spl_board_init(). Hence, introduce a spl_arch_init() > >> method which is called right before spl_board_init() for architecture > >> specific implementation. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lukas Funke <lukas.fu...@weidmueller.com> > > > > I think this could allow for other SoCs to clean up their existing > > Does it make more sense to make this SoC specific then instead of arch > specific to allow broader range of code?
"soc" and "arch" are somewhat interchangeable at times, so I think we can go one step at a time here and bring in this abstraction and see where everyone else is able to clean their code up to. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
