On 25/03/2024 12:32, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
Hi Chanh,
On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 14:21 +0700, Chanh Nguyen wrote:
Add the initial version of the device tree for the Ampere BMC
platform, which is equipped with the Aspeed AST2600 BMC SoC.
Signed-off-by: Chanh Nguyen <ch...@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm/dts/ast2600-ampere.dts | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/ast2600-ampere.dts
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
index 37675a3277..3642d59c89 100755
--- a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
@@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += \
ast2600-greatlakes.dtb \
ast2600-intel.dtb \
ast2600-ncsi.dtb \
+ ast2600-ampere.dtb \
ast2600-p10bmc.dtb \
ast2600-pfr.dtb \
ast2600-qcom-dc-scm-v1.dtb \
Given this hunk and the tags in the `[PATCH]` prefix of the mail
subject you've based this change on OpenBMC's fork of u-boot, which is
heavily (out of date, and) inspired by Aspeed's SDK tree. I've applied
this to OpenBMC's fork for now.
Thank Andrew! I saw my patch on the OpenBMC's fork.
However, you've sent this to the upstream list. You will need to rework
your patch on top of mainline u-boot if you want it accepted there, and
follow all the usual documentation on how to submit patches to the u-
boot project (e.g. you should not be including `u-boot v2019.04-aspeed-
openbmc` in the patch subject prefix in upstream submissions).
Andrew
Sorry all! It is my mistake. I just want to send this to OpenBMC's fork,
but I used the upstream mail list.