Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] >> On Behalf Of Valentin Longchamp >> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 6:23 PM >> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >> Cc: h...@denx.de; holger.bru...@keymile.com >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Keymile boards mainlining, part 2 >> >> Sorry, the whole series is not numbered, -N statt -n ... it will be >> corrected for the very likely v2 of the series posting. > > It would be good if you can split patch series in to small group as per > functionality/SoC, so that it is easy to pull. >
I agree with you about this point. We did it this way since even if some patches affect only one SoC/functionality, there may be some dependancies between patches that are not in the same SoC/functionality group. I'll see what I can do. -- Valentin Longchamp Embedded Software Engineer Hardware and Chip Integration ______________________________________ KEYMILE AG Schwarzenburgstr. 73 CH-3097 Liebefeld Phone +41 31 377 1318 Fax +41 31 377 1212 valentin.longch...@keymile.com www.keymile.com ______________________________________ KEYMILE: A Specialist as a Partner _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot