On 04.04.24 17:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
Date: Thu,  4 Apr 2024 13:47:39 +0200

The default sequence of boot methods is determined by alphabetical sorting
during linkage.

* efi_mgr must run before efi to be UEFI compliant
* pxe should run as last resort

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>

This sound very much like you're working around a standard boot design
flaw.

Who does the alphabetical sorting here?  Is that just a result of how
the toolchain behaves?  If so, that sounds fragile to me and I think
it would be better to make the order explicit in the code.

Thanks for reviewing.

Please, observe the SORT command in our linker script lines

    KEEP(*(SORT(__u_boot_list*)));

This ensures that linker generated lists are always alphabetically sorted. We rely on this in other places too. See part_driver_lookup_type() where GPT must be tested before FAT (commit 96e5b03c8ab7 ("dm: part: Convert partition API use to linker lists").

Best regards

Heinrich


Cheers,

Mark

---
v2:
        no change
---
  boot/bootmeth_efi.c     | 2 +-
  boot/bootmeth_efi_mgr.c | 2 +-
  boot/bootmeth_pxe.c     | 2 +-
  test/boot/bootflow.c    | 2 +-
  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/boot/bootmeth_efi.c b/boot/bootmeth_efi.c
index c4eb331d69e..a46b6c9c805 100644
--- a/boot/bootmeth_efi.c
+++ b/boot/bootmeth_efi.c
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static const struct udevice_id distro_efi_bootmeth_ids[] = {
        { }
  };
-U_BOOT_DRIVER(bootmeth_efi) = {
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(bootmeth_4efi) = {
        .name           = "bootmeth_efi",
        .id             = UCLASS_BOOTMETH,
        .of_match       = distro_efi_bootmeth_ids,
diff --git a/boot/bootmeth_efi_mgr.c b/boot/bootmeth_efi_mgr.c
index ed29d7ef021..b7d429f2c3d 100644
--- a/boot/bootmeth_efi_mgr.c
+++ b/boot/bootmeth_efi_mgr.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static const struct udevice_id efi_mgr_bootmeth_ids[] = {
        { }
  };
-U_BOOT_DRIVER(bootmeth_efi_mgr) = {
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(bootmeth_3efi_mgr) = {
        .name           = "bootmeth_efi_mgr",
        .id             = UCLASS_BOOTMETH,
        .of_match       = efi_mgr_bootmeth_ids,
diff --git a/boot/bootmeth_pxe.c b/boot/bootmeth_pxe.c
index 8d489a11aa4..70f693aa239 100644
--- a/boot/bootmeth_pxe.c
+++ b/boot/bootmeth_pxe.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static const struct udevice_id extlinux_bootmeth_pxe_ids[] 
= {
        { }
  };
-U_BOOT_DRIVER(bootmeth_pxe) = {
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(bootmeth_zpxe) = {
        .name           = "bootmeth_pxe",
        .id             = UCLASS_BOOTMETH,
        .of_match       = extlinux_bootmeth_pxe_ids,
diff --git a/test/boot/bootflow.c b/test/boot/bootflow.c
index 4845b7121c8..e60e9309fa9 100644
--- a/test/boot/bootflow.c
+++ b/test/boot/bootflow.c
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static int bootflow_system(struct unit_test_state *uts)
        if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_BOOTMGR))
                return -EAGAIN;
        ut_assertok(uclass_first_device_err(UCLASS_BOOTSTD, &bootstd));
-       ut_assertok(device_bind(bootstd, DM_DRIVER_GET(bootmeth_efi_mgr),
+       ut_assertok(device_bind(bootstd, DM_DRIVER_GET(bootmeth_3efi_mgr),
                                "efi_mgr", 0, ofnode_null(), &dev));
        ut_assertok(device_probe(dev));
        sandbox_set_fake_efi_mgr_dev(dev, true);
--
2.43.0



Reply via email to