Hi Quentin, Thanks for the hints. Matching the parent ifdef with non-PX30 TPL implementation is indeed a good idea. I'll send the updated version of the patch.
Best regards, Lukasz wt., 16 kwi 2024 o 15:22 Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com> napisał(a): > > Hi Lukasz, > > Please use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to set the Cc and To recipients of > your mail to make sure it reaches the appropriate people explicitly. > > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30-board-tpl.c > Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> (maintainer:ARM) > Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> (maintainer:ARM ROCKCHIP) > Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@vrull.eu> (maintainer:ARM ROCKCHIP) > Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com> (maintainer:ARM ROCKCHIP) > u-boot@lists.denx.de (open list) > > (one can use scripts/get_maintainer.pl on patches instead of files, and > it'll return whatever is needed). > > Plugging `b4` here as well, because it's a pretty nice tool to use: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/b4/b4.git/ One can install it with > pip. I use it for Linux kernel and U-Boot contributions for a couple of > years now and I'm not going back to manual workflow :) > > b4 prep --auto-to-cc would set everything up properly for you. > > On 4/16/24 14:47, Lukasz Czechowski wrote: > > Display TPL init information message only when TPL_BANNER_PRINT > > configuration entry is set. This allows to disable information > > message in case logs on UART are unwanted. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Czechowski <lukasz.czechow...@thaumatec.com> > > This matches Rockchip's non-PX30 TPL, so: > > Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com> > > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30-board-tpl.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30-board-tpl.c > > b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30-board-tpl.c > > index 637a5e1b18..a660816db0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30-board-tpl.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30-board-tpl.c > > @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy) > > * printhex8(0x1234); > > * printascii("string"); > > */ > > +#if CONFIG_TPL_BANNER_PRINT > > printascii("U-Boot TPL board init\n"); > > +#endif > > I'm wondering if we shouldn't have the parent ifdef also match the logic > of the non-PX30 TPL? > > #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_UART) && defined(CONFIG_TPL_SERIAL) > > instead of > > #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_UART) > > ? > > Thanks, > Quentin
