> Hi Baidu, > > >>> diff --git a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c > >>> index dfb1745..f38f755 100644 > >>> --- a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c > >>> +++ b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c > >>> @@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ dump_dirents(struct b_lists *pL) > >>> } > >>> #endif > >>> > >>> -#define DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE 4096 > >>> +#define DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE 1024 > >> > >> Hm, this is not mentioned in the commit log. So is this detection > >> already there and you simply decrease the amount of empty space you are > >> looking for? > >> > > > > 1KB FF is enough to get the conclusion that the erase block is empty. > > I refer kenel to do this change > > Ah, so this is in the kernel, right? If I look into 'fs/jffs2/scan.c' I > see that this constant even changed to 256 in 2.6.37. We should adapt > accordingly.
Yes, that would be me :) The scanning is just a paranoia so therefore I lowered it. Jocke _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
