On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 13:17, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > Apologies for the late reply. I was attending a conference. > > > On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 03:28, Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:04 PM Ilias Apalodimas > > <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 20:52, Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:37 AM Ilias Apalodimas > > > > <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Also quickly looking at this, you need a new function for > > > > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask() (look below) > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 20:20, Ilias Apalodimas > > > > > <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tim, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 20:13, Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 9:33 AM Ilias Apalodimas > > > > > > > <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tim, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the patch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll be away next week, I'll try to find time and take a closer > > > > > > > > look. > > > > > > > > The pipeline [0] shows some TPM related failures > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0] > > > > > > > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tpm/-/commit/9b4be64e41454e17269a968397933eeff300c380 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ilias, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I changed the output of 'tpm pcr_read' so that it shows the algo > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > size causing the test in test/py/tests/test_tpm2.py to fail: > > > > > > > @@ -151,11 +171,12 @@ static int do_tpm_pcr_read(struct cmd_tbl > > > > > > > *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0), 0); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - rc = tpm2_pcr_read(dev, index, priv->pcr_select_min, > > > > > > > TPM2_ALG_SHA256, > > > > > > > - data, TPM2_DIGEST_LEN, &updates); > > > > > > > + rc = tpm2_pcr_read(dev, index, priv->pcr_select_min, algo, > > > > > > > + data, algo_len, &updates); > > > > > > > if (!rc) { > > > > > > > - printf("PCR #%u content (%u known updates):\n", > > > > > > > index, updates); > > > > > > > - print_byte_string(data, TPM2_DIGEST_LEN); > > > > > > > + printf("PCR #%u %s %d byte content (%u known > > > > > > > updates):\n", index, > > > > > > > + tpm2_algorithm_name(algo), algo_len, > > > > > > > updates); > > > > > > > + print_byte_string(data, algo_len); > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failure: > > > > > > > E AssertionError: assert 'PCR #10 content' in 'PCR #10 sha256 32 > > > > > > > byte content (723 known updates):\r\r\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > > > > > 00 00 > > > > > > > 00 00 00 00 00 00\r\r\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > > > > > 00 > > > > > > > 00' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I suppose I need to update test/py/tests/test_tpm2.py as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would I update test/py/tests/test_tpm2.py in the same patch as > > > > > > > the one > > > > > > > that causes the failure? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes please, I'd like patches merged that won't break the CI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do I go about running the tests manually to make sure I've > > > > > > > addressed it? > > > > > > > > > > > > You can send a PR against U-Boots repo (in github) > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > /Ilias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > /Ilias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 03:17, Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For pcr_read and pcr_extend commands allow the digest > > > > > > > > > algorithm to be > > > > > > > > > specified by an additional argument. If not specified it will > > > > > > > > > default to > > > > > > > > > SHA256 for backwards compatibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A follow-on to this could be to extend all PCR banks with the > > > > > > > > > detected > > > > > > > > > algo when the <digest_algo> argument is 'auto'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > v3: > > > > > > > > > - replace tpm2_supported_algorithms with struct and use this > > > > > > > > > to relate hash algoirthm > > > > > > > > > details > > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > > > > > > - use tpm2_algorithm_to_len > > > > > > > > > - use enum tpm2_algorithms > > > > > > > > > - make function names and parameter names more consistent > > > > > > > > > with existing > > > > > > > > > tpm-v2 functions > > > > > > > > > - fix various spelling errors > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > cmd/tpm-v2.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > > > > > > > > include/tpm-v2.h | 67 > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > > > > > > lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c | 4 +-- > > > > > > > > > lib/tpm-v2.c | 62 > > > > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > > > > > > > 4 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/cmd/tpm-v2.c b/cmd/tpm-v2.c > > > > > > > > > index 7e479b9dfe36..2343b4d9cb9e 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/cmd/tpm-v2.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/cmd/tpm-v2.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -99,11 +99,19 @@ static int do_tpm2_pcr_extend(struct > > > > > > > > > cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, > > > > > > > > > struct tpm_chip_priv *priv; > > > > > > > > > u32 index = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0); > > > > > > > > > void *digest = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], > > > > > > > > > NULL, 0), 0); > > > > > > > > > + int algo = TPM2_ALG_SHA256; > > > > > > > > > + int algo_len; > > > > > > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > > u32 rc; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (argc != 3) > > > > > > > > > + if (argc < 3 || argc > 4) > > > > > > > > > return CMD_RET_USAGE; > > > > > > > > > + if (argc == 4) { > > > > > > > > > + algo = tpm2_name_to_algorithm(argv[3]); > > > > > > > > > + if (algo < 0) > > > > > > > > > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + algo_len = tpm2_algorithm_to_len(algo); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = get_tpm(&dev); > > > > > > > > > if (ret) > > > > > > > > > @@ -116,8 +124,12 @@ static int do_tpm2_pcr_extend(struct > > > > > > > > > cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, > > > > > > > > > if (index >= priv->pcr_count) > > > > > > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - rc = tpm2_pcr_extend(dev, index, TPM2_ALG_SHA256, > > > > > > > > > digest, > > > > > > > > > - TPM2_DIGEST_LEN); > > > > > > > > > + rc = tpm2_pcr_extend(dev, index, algo, digest, > > > > > > > > > algo_len); > > > > > > > > > + if (!rc) { > > > > > > > > > + printf("PCR #%u extended with %d byte %s > > > > > > > > > digest\n", index, > > > > > > > > > + algo_len, tpm2_algorithm_name(algo)); > > > > > > > > > + print_byte_string(digest, algo_len); > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unmap_sysmem(digest); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -127,15 +139,23 @@ static int do_tpm2_pcr_extend(struct > > > > > > > > > cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, > > > > > > > > > static int do_tpm_pcr_read(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, > > > > > > > > > int argc, > > > > > > > > > char *const argv[]) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > + enum tpm2_algorithms algo = TPM2_ALG_SHA256; > > > > > > > > > struct udevice *dev; > > > > > > > > > struct tpm_chip_priv *priv; > > > > > > > > > u32 index, rc; > > > > > > > > > + int algo_len; > > > > > > > > > unsigned int updates; > > > > > > > > > void *data; > > > > > > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (argc != 3) > > > > > > > > > + if (argc < 3 || argc > 4) > > > > > > > > > return CMD_RET_USAGE; > > > > > > > > > + if (argc == 4) { > > > > > > > > > + algo = tpm2_name_to_algorithm(argv[3]); > > > > > > > > > + if (algo < 0) > > > > > > > > > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + algo_len = tpm2_algorithm_to_len(algo); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = get_tpm(&dev); > > > > > > > > > if (ret) > > > > > > > > > @@ -151,11 +171,12 @@ static int do_tpm_pcr_read(struct > > > > > > > > > cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0), > > > > > > > > > 0); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - rc = tpm2_pcr_read(dev, index, priv->pcr_select_min, > > > > > > > > > TPM2_ALG_SHA256, > > > > > > > > > - data, TPM2_DIGEST_LEN, &updates); > > > > > > > > > + rc = tpm2_pcr_read(dev, index, priv->pcr_select_min, > > > > > > > > > algo, > > > > > > > > > + data, algo_len, &updates); > > > > > > > > > if (!rc) { > > > > > > > > > - printf("PCR #%u content (%u known > > > > > > > > > updates):\n", index, updates); > > > > > > > > > - print_byte_string(data, TPM2_DIGEST_LEN); > > > > > > > > > + printf("PCR #%u %s %d byte content (%u known > > > > > > > > > updates):\n", index, > > > > > > > > > + tpm2_algorithm_name(algo), algo_len, > > > > > > > > > updates); > > > > > > > > > + print_byte_string(data, algo_len); > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unmap_sysmem(data); > > > > > > > > > @@ -415,14 +436,14 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm2, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, > > > > > > > > > do_tpm, "Issue a TPMv2.x command", > > > > > > > > > " <hierarchy> is one of:\n" > > > > > > > > > " * TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT\n" > > > > > > > > > " * TPM2_RH_PLATFORM\n" > > > > > > > > > -"pcr_extend <pcr> <digest_addr>\n" > > > > > > > > > -" Extend PCR #<pcr> with digest at <digest_addr>.\n" > > > > > > > > > +"pcr_extend <pcr> <digest_addr> [<digest_algo>]\n" > > > > > > > > > +" Extend PCR #<pcr> with digest at <digest_addr> with > > > > > > > > > digest_algo.\n" > > > > > > > > > " <pcr>: index of the PCR\n" > > > > > > > > > -" <digest_addr>: address of a 32-byte SHA256 digest\n" > > > > > > > > > -"pcr_read <pcr> <digest_addr>\n" > > > > > > > > > -" Read PCR #<pcr> to memory address <digest_addr>.\n" > > > > > > > > > +" <digest_addr>: address of digest of digest_algo type > > > > > > > > > (defaults to SHA256)\n" > > > > > > > > > +"pcr_read <pcr> <digest_addr> [<digest_algo>]\n" > > > > > > > > > +" Read PCR #<pcr> to memory address <digest_addr> with > > > > > > > > > <digest_algo>.\n" > > > > > > > > > " <pcr>: index of the PCR\n" > > > > > > > > > -" <digest_addr>: address to store the a 32-byte SHA256 > > > > > > > > > digest\n" > > > > > > > > > +" <digest_addr>: address of digest of digest_algo type > > > > > > > > > (defaults to SHA256)\n" > > > > > > > > > "get_capability <capability> <property> <addr> <count>\n" > > > > > > > > > " Read and display <count> entries indexed by > > > > > > > > > <capability>/<property>.\n" > > > > > > > > > " Values are 4 bytes long and are written at <addr>.\n" > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/tpm-v2.h b/include/tpm-v2.h > > > > > > > > > index 33dd103767c4..263f9529e55d 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/tpm-v2.h > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/tpm-v2.h > > > > > > > > > @@ -386,7 +386,54 @@ enum tpm2_algorithms { > > > > > > > > > TPM2_ALG_SM3_256 = 0x12, > > > > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -extern const enum tpm2_algorithms > > > > > > > > > tpm2_supported_algorithms[4]; > > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > > > > + * struct digest_info - details of supported digests > > > > > > > > > + * > > > > > > > > > + * @hash_name: hash name > > > > > > > > > + * @hash_alg: hash algorithm id > > > > > > > > > + * @hash_mask: hash registry mask > > > > > > > > > + * @hash_len: hash digest length > > > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > > > +struct digest_info { > > > > > > > > > + const char *hash_name; > > > > > > > > > + u16 hash_alg; > > > > > > > > > + u32 hash_mask; > > > > > > > > > + u16 hash_len; > > > > > > > > > +}; > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > +/* Algorithm Registry */ > > > > > > > > > +#define TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA1 0x00000001 > > > > > > > > > +#define TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA256 0x00000002 > > > > > > > > > +#define TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA384 0x00000004 > > > > > > > > > +#define TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA512 0x00000008 > > > > > > > > > +#define TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SM3_256 0x00000010 > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > +static const struct digest_info hash_algo_list[] = { > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + "sha1", > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_ALG_SHA1, > > > > > > > > > + TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA1, > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE, > > > > > > > > > + }, > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + "sha256", > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_ALG_SHA256, > > > > > > > > > + TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA256, > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE, > > > > > > > > > + }, > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + "sha384", > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_ALG_SHA384, > > > > > > > > > + TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA384, > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_SHA384_DIGEST_SIZE, > > > > > > > > > + }, > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + "sha512", > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_ALG_SHA512, > > > > > > > > > + TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA512, > > > > > > > > > + TPM2_SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE, > > > > > > > > > + }, > > > > > > > > > +}; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static inline u16 tpm2_algorithm_to_len(enum tpm2_algorithms > > > > > > > > > a) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > @@ -965,4 +1012,22 @@ u32 tpm2_enable_nvcommits(struct > > > > > > > > > udevice *dev, uint vendor_cmd, > > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > > u32 tpm2_auto_start(struct udevice *dev); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > > > > + * tpm2_name_to_algorithm() - Return an algorithm id given a > > > > > > > > > supported > > > > > > > > > + * algorithm name > > > > > > > > > + * > > > > > > > > > + * @name: algorithm name > > > > > > > > > + * Return: enum tpm2_algorithms or -EINVAL > > > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > > > +enum tpm2_algorithms tpm2_name_to_algorithm(const char > > > > > > > > > *name); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > > > > + * tpm2_algorithm_name() - Return an algorithm name string > > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > + * supported algorithm id > > > > > > > > > + * > > > > > > > > > + * @algorithm_id: algorithm defined in enum tpm2_algorithms > > > > > > > > > + * Return: algorithm name string or "" > > > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > > > +const char *tpm2_algorithm_name(enum tpm2_algorithms); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > #endif /* __TPM_V2_H */ > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c > > > > > > > > > b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c > > > > > > > > > index b07e0099c27e..cf5d8de018a7 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ static efi_status_t > > > > > > > > > tcg2_hash_pe_image(void *efi, u64 efi_size, > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > digest_list->count = 0; > > > > > > > > > - for (i = 0; i < > > > > > > > > > ARRAY_SIZE(tpm2_supported_algorithms); i++) { > > > > > > > > > - u16 hash_alg = tpm2_supported_algorithms[i]; > > > > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_algo_list); i++) { > > > > > > > > > + u16 hash_alg = hash_algo_list[i].hash_alg; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (!(active & > > > > > > > > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask(hash_alg))) > > > > > > > > > continue; > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/tpm-v2.c b/lib/tpm-v2.c > > > > > > > > > index 68eaaa639f89..83f490c82541 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/lib/tpm-v2.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/lib/tpm-v2.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -22,13 +22,6 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #include "tpm-utils.h" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -const enum tpm2_algorithms tpm2_supported_algorithms[4] = { > > > > > > > > > - TPM2_ALG_SHA1, > > > > > > > > > - , > > > > > > > > > - TPM2_ALG_SHA384, > > > > > > > > > - TPM2_ALG_SHA512, > > > > > > > > > -}; > > > > > > > > > > The current tpm2_algorithm_to_mask() operates on those values and bits > > > > > shifts based on the enum. Since you remove the enum above, you must > > > > > also change the function implementation and return > > > > > hash_algo_list.hash_mask > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's already taken care of as the calls to tpm2_algorithm_to_mask() > > > > in my patch were adjusted from: > > > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask(tpm2_supported_algorithms[i]) > > > > to > > > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask(hash_algo_list[i].hash_alg) > > > > > > > > The hash_alg is the value from the previous enum. > > > > > > The previous enums were defining TPM2_ALG_SHA1=1, TPM2_ALG_SHA256=2 etc > > > The current values are different. On top of that the .hash_mask entry > > > of digest_info is never used. So you need to change > > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask() and directly return the hash_mask > > > > > > > Hi Ilias, > > > > Just getting back to this. I don't agree with your assessment. > > > > The previous enum: > > -const enum tpm2_algorithms tpm2_supported_algorithms[4] = { > > - TPM2_ALG_SHA1, > > - TPM2_ALG_SHA256, > > - TPM2_ALG_SHA384, > > - TPM2_ALG_SHA512, > > -}; > > > > is defining 4 values which equate to 0x04, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D (not 1, 2, > > 3, 4 as you say) which is what I'm putting in the hash_alg field. The > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask macro shifts those values (not the index into > > the enum). > > > > So with the current code: > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tpm2_supported_algorithms); i++) { > > int alg = tpm2_supported_algorithms[i]; > > printf("alg:0x%02x mask=0x%02x\n", alg, > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask(alg)); > > } > > alg:0x04 mask=0x10 > > alg:0x0b mask=0x800 > > alg:0x0c mask=0x1000 > > alg:0x0d mask=0x2000 > > > > With this proposed patch: > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_algo_list); i++) { > > int alg = hash_algo_list[i].hash_alg; > > printf("alg:0x%02x mask=0x%02x %s\n", alg, > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask(alg), tpm2_algorithm_name(alg)); > > } > > alg:0x04 mask=0x10 sha1 > > alg:0x0b mask=0x800 sha256 > > alg:0x0c mask=0x1000 sha384 > > alg:0x0d mask=0x2000 sha512 > > > > Am I misunderstanding something else you are pointing out? > > > > Maybe it would be easier to compare if I named the new struct > > tpm2_supported_algorithms? > > Ok, I think we are looking at a preexisting bug, because the prints > above make no sense to me. > > There was an enum in the current code > const enum tpm2_algorithms tpm2_supported_algorithms[4] = { > TPM2_ALG_SHA1, > TPM2_ALG_SHA256, > TPM2_ALG_SHA384, > TPM2_ALG_SHA512, > } > But those values are defined in include/tpm-v2.h hence the enum values > were not starting from 0... > > Reading at the TCG spec [0] we should be adding any of the values > defined below to HashAlgorithmBitMap. > #define EFI_TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA1 0x00000001 > #define EFI_TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA256 0x00000002 > #define EFI_TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA384 0x00000004 > #define EFI_TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SHA512 0x00000008 > #define EFI_TCG2_BOOT_HASH_ALG_SM3_256 0x00000010 > > We used to do that in v2023.01. The patch below is on top of 2023.01 > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c > index a525ebf75b58..7371c9e94b5c 100644 > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c > @@ -1628,6 +1628,7 @@ static efi_status_t create_specid_event(struct > udevice *dev, void *buffer, > u16 hash_alg = hash_algo_list[i].hash_alg; > u16 hash_len = hash_algo_list[i].hash_len; > > + printf("Trying to add %08x and %08x\n", hash_alg, > alg_to_mask(hash_alg)); > if (active & alg_to_mask(hash_alg)) { > put_unaligned_le16(hash_alg, > > &spec_event->digest_sizes[alg_count].algorithm_id); > > prints > > Trying to add 00000004 and 00000001 > Trying to add 0000000b and 00000002 > Trying to add 0000000c and 00000004 > Trying to add 0000000d and 00000008 > > The values of 0x00000001, 0x00000002 etc are what's added to the eventlog > > But since 97707f12fdabf we are putting different values (which I think > is wrong and not what the spec expects....) > I also think Eddie intended to make tpm2_supported_algorithms an enum > that starts from 0, but the values he used were already defined and > that's how we missed it ... > > Eddie any idea if that's what happened? > > Tim, we will need to fix all this regardless. The fix should be > relatively simple, just return the newly added values instead of the > algorithm_to_mask value, when adding it on the eventlog. > Can you take a look at the spec and verify what I am seeing? At some > point, we also need to add the value checking in self-tests, rather > than only looking at the EFI return code.
Apologies for the noise, I wasn't remembering the spec properly. The hash values are only supposed to be used on getting the capability and active PCR banks. Let me read this patch again Thanks /Ilias > > > [0] 6.4.3 Related Definitions > https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/EFI-Protocol-Specification-rev13-160330final.pdf > > Thanks > /Ilias > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Tim > > > > > Cheers > > > /Ilias > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > /Ilias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > int tcg2_get_active_pcr_banks(struct udevice *dev, u32 > > > > > > > > > *active_pcr_banks) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > u32 supported = 0; > > > > > > > > > @@ -82,14 +75,14 @@ int tcg2_create_digest(struct udevice > > > > > > > > > *dev, const u8 *input, u32 length, > > > > > > > > > return rc; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > digest_list->count = 0; > > > > > > > > > - for (i = 0; i < > > > > > > > > > ARRAY_SIZE(tpm2_supported_algorithms); ++i) { > > > > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_algo_list); ++i) { > > > > > > > > > u32 mask = > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask(tpm2_supported_algorithms[i]); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > tpm2_algorithm_to_mask(hash_algo_list[i].hash_alg); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (!(active & mask))
