While working on bootflow, we noticed some wording inconsistencies with
bootmeth versus bootmethod.

According to [1], we should use bootmeth(s), not bootmethod(s):

"""
For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:

    - bootdev is used instead of bootdevice, because 'device' is overused,
        is everywhere in U-Boot, can be confused with udevice
    - bootmeth - because 'method' is too vanilla, appears 1300 times in
        U-Boot
"""

[1] c.f. https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211023232635.9195-1-...@chromium.org/

First patch fixes some trivial typos, second patch replaces all
occurences of bootmethod(s) -> bootmeth(s).

Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpersh...@baylibre.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Made into a series
- New patch replaces all bootmethod(s) -> bootmeth(s)
- Link to v1: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603-bootmeth-typos-v1-1-6edbdb469...@baylibre.com

---
Mattijs Korpershoek (2):
      bootstd: Fix a handful of doc typos in bootmeth
      bootstd: Replace bootmethod(s) -> bootmeth(s)

 board/sandbox/sandbox.env |  2 +-
 boot/bootmeth-uclass.c    |  2 +-
 include/bootmeth.h        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 include/extlinux.h        |  2 +-
 test/boot/bootflow.c      |  2 +-
 test/boot/bootmeth.c      |  6 +++---
 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ea722aa5eb33740ae77e8816aeb72b385e621cd0
change-id: 20240603-bootmeth-typos-47c865e70ccf

Best regards,
-- 
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpersh...@baylibre.com>

Reply via email to