On 6/4/24 16:27, lukas.funke-...@weidmueller.com wrote:
From: Lukas Funke <lukas.fu...@weidmueller.com>
Use common zynqmp_pm_get_chipid() function to get the chip revision
Signed-off-by: Lukas Funke <lukas.fu...@weidmueller.com>
---
(no changes since v1)
drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c b/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c
index 3d8c25c19bb..3d949c4e612 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c
@@ -45,23 +45,22 @@ static const struct soc_ops soc_xilinx_versal_ops = {
static int soc_xilinx_versal_probe(struct udevice *dev)
{
struct soc_xilinx_versal_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
- u32 ret_payload[PAYLOAD_ARG_CNT];
+ u32 idcode, version;
int ret;
priv->family = versal_family;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE)) {
- ret = xilinx_pm_request(PM_GET_CHIPID, 0, 0, 0, 0,
- ret_payload);
+ if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE)) {
+ ret = zynqmp_pm_get_chipid(&idcode, &version);
This function is defined in 6/7 that's why this will fail when it compiles which
end up in non bisectable tree.
if (ret)
return ret;
} else {
- ret_payload[2] = readl(VERSAL_PS_PMC_VERSION);
- if (!ret_payload[2])
+ version = readl(VERSAL_PS_PMC_VERSION);
+ if (!version)
return -EINVAL;
}
- priv->revision = ret_payload[2] >> VERSAL_PS_VER_SHIFT;
+ priv->revision = version >> VERSAL_PS_VER_SHIFT;
return 0;
}
But code is ok.
M