On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:26 PM Sam Protsenko <semen.protse...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 4:12 PM Sam Protsenko <semen.protse...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:53 PM Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 3/7/24 19:04, Sam Protsenko wrote: > > > > Sometimes clocks provided to a consumer might not have .set_rate > > > > operation (like gate or mux clocks), but have CLK_SET_PARENT_RATE flag > > > > set. In that case it's usually possible to find a parent up the tree > > > > which is capable of setting the rate (div, pll, etc). Implement a simple > > > > lookup procedure for such cases, to traverse the clock tree until > > > > .set_rate capable parent is found, and use that parent to actually > > > > change the rate. The search will stop once the first .set_rate capable > > > > clock is found, which is usually enough to handle most cases. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protse...@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > Can you give an example of where this is needed? > > > > > > > Sure. In my case it's needed for eMMC enablement on E850-96 board. > > eMMC node in the device tree [1] is a gate clock > > (CLK_GOUT_MMC_EMBD_SDCLKIN), so the MMC driver won't be able to change > > its rate. But that clock actually has CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag set in > > the clock driver [2]. So the right thing to do in this case (and > > that's basically how it's done in Linux kernel too) is to traverse the > > clock tree upwards, and try to find the parent capable to do .set_rate > > (which is usually a divider clock), and use it to change the clock > > rate. I'm working on exynos_dw_mmc driver [3] right now, making it use > > CCF clocks, but I can't do that before this patch is applied. > > > > Grepping the U-Boot tree I can see the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is > > also used in various IMX clock drivers and STM32MP13 clock driver. I > > guess without this change those flags will be basically ignored. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Hi Sean, > > Just wanted to check if you think my explanation above is ok and the > patch can be applied? I'm finishing my new patch series for enabling > MMC on E850-96, but this patch has to be applied first. > > Thanks! >
Hi Tom, Would it be reasonable to ask you to take care of this patch? It's been ignored for 3 months now, but it's needed for eMMC enablement on E850-96 board. Thanks! > > [1] > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/arch/arm/dts/exynos850.dtsi#L408 > > [2] > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/drivers/clk/exynos/clk-exynos850.c#L353 > > [3] > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/drivers/mmc/exynos_dw_mmc.c#L117 > > > > > --Sean
