On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 7:32 AM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > > > 在2024年6月18日六月 上午12:29，Tom Rini写道： > > [...] > > >> Acked-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> > > > > > > Can we please get either this, or > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240524210817.1953298-1-rasmus.villem...@prevas.dk/ > > > merged for master? The number of false negatives in CI due to this is > > > big issue for getting more contributors to use CI. Thanks. > > > > It seems like CYCLIC doesn't have it's own custodian tree. > > How are we going to handle it in this case? > > Note that in U-Boot it's less important to have a tree per sub-section > and more important that custodians have a tree (and then use appropriate > tags when sending pull requests). > > -- > Tom
Stefan and Tom, I'm seeing CI issues here even with 5000us [1]: host bind 0 /tmp/sandbox/persistent-cyclic function wdt-gpio-level took too long: 5368us vs 5000us max Best Regards, Tim [1] https://dev.azure.com/u-boot/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=8737&view=logs&j=a1270dec-081b-5c65-5cd5-5e915a842596&t=69f6cf72-86f3-551a-807d-f28f62a1426f&l=748
