On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 9:50 AM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 10:14:27AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > Tony Dinh <mibo...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > I'm trying to move some envs from a board header file to the default > > > env file. I recall that the envs in CONFIG_DEFAULT_ENV_FILE are > > > appended to the envs in CFG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS. As you mentioned here > > > before: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220810170439.GJ1146598@bill-the-cat/ > > > > > > But it looks like envs in CFG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS are completely > > > erased, and then the envs are populated with what's in > > > CONFIG_DEFAULT_ENV_FILE. > > > > > > > Author of CONFIG_DEFAULT_ENV_FILE here. > > > > Yes, the point of that option is that you supply the entire and full > > intended default environment in that file. No U-Boot CONFIG_ options of > > CFG_* defines or anything else affects what goes into the default env > > when that option is used. [At run-time, U-Boot probably injects/sets a > > few env vars, but that's true regardless of how the default env came to > > be]. > > > > I think there may be some confusion with the much newer > > CONFIG_ENV_SOURCE_FILE, which is another mechanism entirely. In that > > case the pointed-to source file is sent through cpp, thus allowing some > > u-boot config stuff to be used/referenced, and I think some further > > bells-and-whistles also exist. I don't know if CFG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS > > are taken into account in that case or not. > > Yes, I think you're right about the confusion as I too missed that in my > reply.
OK, thank you all for your clarification! All the best, Tony > > -- > Tom
