Hi MacPaul,
Le 21/04/2011 04:57, Macpaul Lin a écrit :
> HI Albert,
>
> 2011/4/16 Albert ARIBAUD<albert.u.b...@aribaud.net>:
>> Please resend a V3 patch set of the four patches, even if two of them are
>> unchanged. Make sure all patches have their history updated, even the
>> unchanged patches ('V3: no change'). I'll apply the whole set in one go.
>>
>> Amicalement,
>> --
>> Albert.
>>
>
> Patch v3 of this set of patches has been send on 2011-04-16
>
> Please refer to
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/91478/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/91479/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/91476/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/91477/
91476 and 91477 are ok, I'll apply them.
91478 and 91479, though, I don't see their point: they are adding a file
that obviously no one used before it was added, but that no one uses
now. These header files are dead code, and should only be added in a
patch where other code changes actually make them required.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
