Dear Graeme Russ, In message <4db15dd7.8050...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > I think it wouldbe even better if we could push our changes back into > > the "mainline" version of checkpatch, so that the U-Boot specific > > behaviour can beenabled by a command line option (checkpatch --uboot ?). > > > > Forking is not so preferrable here, I think. > > I agree, but if the Linux guys won't accept patches for U-Boot specific > semantics, what choice do we have?
Did you ask him, and he refused, or is this just a hypothetical question? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "Where shall I begin, please your Majesty?" he asked. "Begin at the beginning," the King said, gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop." - Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Lewis Carroll _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
