On mer., juil. 24, 2024 at 16:40, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
[...] >> > >> >Ok, so does that mean that you agree that this code is safe and we don't >> >need any further action to fix it? >> >> No fix needed. >> >> Tom just needs to nark it in Coverity as "intended". > > Thanks. I'll copy/paste the explanation in and close it next time I'm > over there. I've done it already, added a lore link to this thread as justification. > > -- > Tom
