On Friday, April 29, 2011 06:20:36 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Andy Fleming wrote: > > It's just that the other way would also be possible. I re-read the > > thread where this was discussed, and while I definitely agree that the > > originally proposed solution was highly error-prone, I think > > *allowing* users to do this is fine: > > > > mmc read <dev>:<part> <addr> <blk> <cnt> > > > > Is there a reason that this wouldn't work with the current model? > > Of course it works, but I don't like it: > > - I think different user interfaces for the same thing are usually > confusing.
and bloatful -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
