On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:36:00PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 25 Sept 2024 at 19:26, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 02:49:56PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 22:35, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 08:01:36AM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > When Labgrid is used, it can get U-Boot ready for running tests. It > > > > > prints a message when it has done so. > > > > > > > > > > Add logic to detect this message and accept it. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > (no changes since v1) > > > > > > > > > > test/py/u_boot_console_base.py | 9 +++++---- > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > What happens is that labgrid can also be told to look for and then > > > > interrupt autoboot, just like our pytests can do, and the system is at > > > > the prompt. But this is also what it's like for a system with autoboot > > > > disabled. Do we actually need this patch to achieve the functionality > > > > you want? Doesn't that already just happen? > > > > > > The point of this patch is actually to remove code in pytest, by > > > allowing it to skip all the banner-detection stuff. It does not affect > > > things in Labgrid, since it still needs to watch for banners, etc. > > > > But you can't remove code from pytest, people can and will run the suite > > outside of labgrid. > > Yes, that's right. I meant that with Labgrid the code is not used.
OK. I still think this (and I assume the related flag to tell whichever helper that was that the platform is ready to go) are too implementation specific. > > > Without this patch, we have to tell Labgrid's U-Boot driver to do > > > nothing, so that pytest does it. But that is not a good idea, since > > > Labgrid has a lot more info about the board than pytest has. For > > > example, look at all the SPL-banner-count stuff. > > > > Why do you have to tell it to do nothing? The pytest suite works fine, > > today, if the board stops at the prompt automatically. To be clear, the > > labgrid yaml file I'm using with my scripts has the information to stop > > autoboot in it and it's not causing a problem. > > But if it wasn't causing a problem I would not have invented this > annoying scheme. Well, I honestly thought it might be a remnant from development that wasn't needed once everything else was done. I do that from time to time myself. > For several boards, by the time pytest gets to see > the output it is too late to press a key and stop. Why / how? Do we perhaps need to adjust the timeout upwards, slightly? Especially in light of the changes you also did to detect a "dead" board and so we don't wait 30 minutes for a test run to fail. > Also, some boards > have a different prompt which is not detected by pytest. > > For example: > configs/am62x_beagleplay_a53_defconfig:CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_PROMPT="Press > SPACE to abort autoboot in %d seconds\n" Yeah, I had forgotten that as I turn that off along with turning on other tests via config fragment, on that platform. That really is a deficiency in our pytest version of this. > > > Basically, without this patch we cannot use '-s uboot' to tell the > > > Labgrid strategy to take us to a U-Boot prompt. We must just use a raw > > > console with no strategy, relying on pytest to do all the work. > > > > > > I hope that helps explain the problem? > > > > I think I see what you're saying, and it's based on the assumption that > > we'll make everyone either use labgrid? > > Not at all. I tested this version of the series again with my > pre-Labgrid lab and it works fine. But I do believe that the hooks > that pytest has are not ideal for use with Labgrid. OK. But, why can't you make use of the labgrid functionality to pause the board? It's the state flag for labgrid-client yes? Dropping that in with my labgrid support would be just a tweak to the console script to check if the board set labgrid_strategy or something, and I think you could adapt yours to that too? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
