Hi Mattijs, Simon,
On 10/1/24 2:07 PM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
Hi Simon,
On mar., oct. 01, 2024 at 05:18, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 at 14:48, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
This series attempts to migrate all sunxi boards to use standard boot,
along with a text environment.
Changes in v2:
- Add new patch to resolve BOOTSTD->BLK recursion with Kconfig
- Put the FEL bootmeth before all other global bootmeths
- Convert the other DISTRO_DEFAULTS in the Kconfig too
- Keep BOOTCMD_SUNXI_COMPAT
- Keep bootcmd_sunxi_compat if OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT is enabled
Simon Glass (8):
blk: Make functions available unconditionally
bootstd: Avoid calling unavailable block functions
bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK
sunxi: Add a bootmeth for FEL
sunxi: Move to bootstd
sunxi: Drop old distro boot variables
env: Provide a work-around for unquoting fdtfile
sunxi: Move to text environment
Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm/Kconfig | 10 +-
board/sunxi/sunxi.env | 152 +++++++++++
boot/Kconfig | 16 +-
boot/Makefile | 1 +
boot/bootdev-uclass.c | 3 +
boot/bootmeth_fel.c | 81 ++++++
.../gardena-smart-gateway-mt7688_defconfig | 1 +
doc/usage/environment.rst | 12 +
include/blk.h | 9 +-
include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 238 ------------------
11 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 246 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 board/sunxi/sunxi.env
create mode 100644 boot/bootmeth_fel.c
--
2.34.1
I'm just checking on this series. Are there any comments, or can it be applied?
Quentin mentioned a typo in patch 3/8, see:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1f963aa8-948a-4657-9f1b-a3bc38df4...@cherry.de/
Well, is it really a typo or was this still a WIP patch that made it to
the ML somehow? That was basically the "question" or concern about "wip"
appearing in the commit log :)
Cheers,
Quentin
