On 10/4/2024 6:50 PM, Prasanth Babu Mantena wrote:
From: Santhosh Kumar K <[email protected]>
Currently, the allocation of DMA channel[0] for memcpy is happening
in udma_transfer() for every transfer, which leads to a huge overhead
for each transfer, especially in case of nand page reads. So, move this
[..]
@@ -2590,6 +2565,7 @@ static int udma_probe(struct udevice *dev)
struct udevice *tmp;
struct udevice *tisci_dev = NULL;
struct udma_tisci_rm *tisci_rm = &ud->tisci_rm;
+ struct udma_chan *uc;
ofnode navss_ofnode = ofnode_get_parent(dev_ofnode(dev));
ud->match_data = (void *)dev_get_driver_data(dev);
@@ -2714,6 +2690,42 @@ static int udma_probe(struct udevice *dev)
uc_priv->supported = DMA_SUPPORTS_MEM_TO_MEM | DMA_SUPPORTS_MEM_TO_DEV;
+ uc = &ud->channels[0];
+ switch (ud->match_data->type) {
+ case DMA_TYPE_UDMA:
+ ret = udma_alloc_chan_resources(uc);
+ break;
+ case DMA_TYPE_BCDMA:
+ ret = bcdma_alloc_chan_resources(uc);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
shouldn't we treat this default case as error and do some dev_err prints ?
+ };
+
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, " Channel 0 allocation failure %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
No need of this ret
+ }
+
+ return 0;
do 'return ret' here
+}
+
+static int udma_remove(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct udma_dev *ud = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ struct udma_chan *uc = &ud->channels[0];
+
+ switch (ud->match_data->type) {
+ case DMA_TYPE_UDMA:
+ udma_free_chan_resources(uc);
+ break;
+ case DMA_TYPE_BCDMA:
+ bcdma_free_bchan_resources(uc);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
shouldn't we treat this default case as error and do some dev_err prints ?
+ };
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2855,5 +2867,7 @@ U_BOOT_DRIVER(ti_edma3) = {
.of_match = udma_ids,
.ops = &udma_ops,
.probe = udma_probe,
+ .remove = udma_remove,
.priv_auto = sizeof(struct udma_dev),
+ .flags = DM_FLAG_OS_PREPARE,
};