Hi,
Tested with the non-stacked default single configuration on ZynqMP zcu102 board 
and didn’t see any issue.

ZynqMP> sf probe 0 0 0
SF: Detected mt25qu512a with page size 256 Bytes, erase size 64 KiB, total 64 
MiB
ZynqMP> sf erase 0x0 0x4000000;mw.b 0x8000 aabbccdd 0x4000000;sf write 0x8000 
0x0 0x4000000;mw.b 0x8008000 0x0 0x4000000;sf read 0x8008000 0x0 
0x4000000;cmp.b 0x8000 0x8008000 0x4000000
SF: 67108864 bytes @ 0x0 Erased: OK
device 0 whole chip
SF: 67108864 bytes @ 0x0 Written: OK
device 0 whole chip
SF: 67108864 bytes @ 0x0 Read: OK
Total of 67108864 byte(s) were the same

Thanks
Venkatesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 2:12 PM
> To: Abbarapu, Venkatesh <[email protected]>; Marek Vasut
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>; Ashok Reddy Soma
> <[email protected]>; Jagan Teki <[email protected]>;
> Michael Walle <[email protected]>; Simek, Michal <[email protected]>;
> Patrice Chotard <[email protected]>; Patrick Delaunay
> <[email protected]>; Pratyush Yadav <[email protected]>; Quentin
> Schulz <[email protected]>; Sean Anderson <[email protected]>;
> Simon Glass <[email protected]>; Takahiro Kuwano
> <[email protected]>; Tom Rini <[email protected]>; Tudor
> Ambarus <[email protected]>; uboot-stm32@st-md-
> mailman.stormreply.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "spi: zynq_qspi: Add parallel memories 
> support in
> QSPI driver"
> 
> On 10/23/24 5:18 AM, Abbarapu, Venkatesh wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> > There was some issue and fix is sent
> > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20241018082644.22495-1-venkatesh.abbara
> > [email protected]/T/#u
> 
> Is this one fix or three fixes for three different issues ?
> 
> This seems to fix READ errors, which is apparently another error introduced 
> by this
> stuff. In my case, plain and simply 'sf probe ; sf update' combination with 
> single non-
> stacked SPI NOR does not work. Was such a simple configuration ever tested ?
> 
> > Not sure we need to revert whole parallel/stacked support?
> Please stop top-posting.

Reply via email to