On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 07:42:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Standard passage provides for a bloblist to be passed from one firmware > phase to the next. That can be used to pass the devicetree along as well. > Add an option to support this. > > Tests for this will be added as part of the Universal Payload work. > > Note: This is the correct way to deal with bloblist, since it allows > boards to choose whether they want to use the devicetree from there, or > not. > > Link: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > Link: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > Link: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > Link: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > Link: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > Link: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/
You should %s#https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch#https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot all of these Links, aside from shorter, it's on much more broadly distributed infrastructure. And this is a general comment as well. > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > --- > > common/bloblist.c | 1 + > doc/develop/devicetree/control.rst | 3 ++ > dts/Kconfig | 8 ++++++ > include/fdtdec.h | 3 +- > lib/fdtdec.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) The rest of this, I need to think on. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
