> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] gpio: imx_rgpio2p: Move 8ulp_data to data > section > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 11:37 AM Peng Fan (OSS) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > > > > have_dual_base is set to false, so the 8ulp_data will be put in BSS > > section which conflicts with the area of u-boot.dtb which padded just > > after u-boot-nodtb.bin. So move 8ulp_data to data section to avoid > its > > content being corrupted by dtb. > ... > > -static struct imx_rgpio2p_soc_data imx8ulp_data = { > > +static struct imx_rgpio2p_soc_data imx8ulp_data __section(".data") > = > > +{ > > .have_dual_base = false, > > Isn't it the same kind of problem that was discussed before?
It is different case here. Here the imx8ulp_data is not a local variable. It could not be dynamically allocated. Thanks, Peng. > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > lore.kernel.org%2Fall%2F20241017034507.GJ4959%40bill-the- > cat%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C8832a4f253ce4f > 5f58bf08dd13c83e1b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0 > %7C0%7C638688472963187297%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ > FbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkF > OIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sZJoC%2B > VY5lKRwobq0H62MauDk%2FI82OEQZxsW2OxaQPo%3D&reserved=0

