Dear Aneesh V,

In message <4dd264b7.9060...@ti.com> you wrote:
> 
> In ARM literature this kind of situations are also referred to as "self-
> modifying". Here is an excerpt from ARM manual gloassary:

I see. Thanks.

> > Well, all the data copy will also use cached writes, which are much
> 
> You mean, you will do a range-flush on only the .text section's area?

That should indeed be sufficient.

> > faster.  I think this will result in measurable time differences.
>
> Relocation itself was not taking a huge amount of time in my
> measurement sometime back. It was about 16 ms for OMAP4.

I was especially talking about the loading from external storage, not
primarily relocation.  This will even be mnore important if we had
(much) bigger images - like when loading an OS kernel as second stage
payload instead of U-Boot.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
I see that Microsoft's campaign  to  destroy  all  knowledge  of  any
operating   environment   but  its  own  environment-of-the-year  has
succeeded in creating a generation of users who don't understand  the
concept of a shell...
            -- L. Peter Deutsch in <m0x5jnx-000r...@lamp.aladdin.com>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to