Hi Scott,
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:20 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:24:34 +0530
> Aneesh V<ane...@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 12:02 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Sun, 15 May 2011 20:51:24 +0530
>>> Aneesh V<ane...@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h
>>>> b/arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h
>>>> index 2a84d27..2ce020e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h
>>>> @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ typedef struct global_data {
>>>> #define GD_FLG_DISABLE_CONSOLE 0x00040 /* Disable console (in& out)
>>>> */
>>>> #define GD_FLG_ENV_READY 0x00080 /* Environment imported into
>>>> hash table */
>>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRELOADER
>>>> +/* SPL works from internal RAM. gd pointer can be in .data section */
>>>> +#define DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR extern gd_t *gd
>>>> +#else
>>>> #define DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR register volatile gd_t *gd asm
>>>> ("r8")
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Is this appropriate for all ARM boards (e.g. those currently using
>>> nand_spl)?
>>
>> None of the SPL's other than this one seems to be using global data
>> today. If anybody wants to use it this seems to be the logical option
>> for me because by definition SPL runs from some kind of RAM so global
>> data can be placed in the .data section of SPL.
>
> There is nand_spl code, including ARM, that uses gd. E.g. putc() in
> board/davinci/da8xxevm/hawkboard_nand_spl.c.
>
> This comment also applies to the other uses of CONFIG_PRELOADER -- are all
> of those changes appropriate for the existing nand_spl users?
I would probably revert the change as advised by Wolfgang.
best regards,
Aneesh
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
