Hi Heinrich, On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 at 04:52, Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > If a single configuration node lacks a description, this does not rule out > that another node with a description matches. Anyway we have the default > configuration as a fallback. > > So continue if a description is missing. >
That field is mandatory, so we should really fail if it is missing. What problem are you trying to solve here? Regards, Simon > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> > --- > boot/common_fit.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/boot/common_fit.c b/boot/common_fit.c > index a2f9b8d83c3..4c134e0e86f 100644 > --- a/boot/common_fit.c > +++ b/boot/common_fit.c > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int fit_find_config_node(const void *fdt) > printf("%s: Missing FDT description in DTB\n", > __func__); > #endif > - return -EINVAL; > + continue; > } > > if (dflt_conf_name) { > -- > 2.47.1 > [1] https://fitspec.osfw.foundation/#configuration-nodes
