Dear "J. William Campbell", In message <4ddc6f46.4090...@comcast.net> you wrote: > > Well, it is not quite that simple. The "accuracy" of the 1 ms > interrupt rate is controlled in all cases I know about by the resolution > of the programmable divider used to produce it. It appears that the x86
I mentioned a couple of times before that accuracy has never been a design criterion. Please also keep in mind that there are areas in the code where we block interrupts, and we make zero efforts to detect or compensate for this in the timer code. This simply is not important. We are not talking about ppm here, we are talking about somting that is just good enough for what it is being used, and that allows easily for +/- 10% tolerances. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Phone Company." _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
